Press
Releases
| Ministry of Earth Sciences Locates and Recovers GSLV
subsystems | |
|
Union Minister for Science & Technology and Earth
Sciences, Shri Kapil Sibal said at a Press Conference in New Delhi today revealed
that the Ministry of Earth Sciences has successfully recovered some of the debri
of GSLV from the sea floor. The team was able to recover three of the four engines
i.e S-1, S-2 and S-3 and large debri from S-4 stage. He expressed hope that the
recovery will enable ISRO to analyse the data and physically verify the debri
to reach the conclusion a as to why the launche failed. The Minister further said
that this is only the second recovery in the history of space programme . At
the request of the Department of Space (DOS), Secretary, Ministry of Earth Sciences
(MoES) agreed to take up the mission of location and possible recovery of GSLV
subsystems, the rocket that failed on 10th July, 2006 off Sriharikota and the
debri was noticed falling into the nearby sea (Bay of Bengal). The MoES taken
up the national mission through its autonomous institutions, National Centre for
Antarctica and Ocean Research (NCAOR), Goa and National Institute of Ocean Technology
(NIOT), Chennai. A team was mobilized from Chennai on 15th July to begin the sonar
surveys based on the four impact predicted points provided by the ISRO and the
location accuracy was defined at +/- 300 m. The four points represent the four
L40 strap-on engines, one of which was a failure engine that caused the mishap.
Four ships of MoES, i.e., ORV Sagar Kanya, CRV Sagar Purvi, CRV Sagar Paschimi
and a chartered vessel, Akademik Boris Petrov were pressed into operation as per
requirement both for sonar surveys, diving operations and recovery of the located
sub-systems. The first sonar surveys around the four predicted impact points resulted
in identification of a number of targets on the seafloor. An area of about 30
sq. km was covered. Physical verification of the seafloor for the identified targets
and confirmation of the strap-on debri was taken up from 19th July by conducting
diving operations in the area. A survey boat and two canoes were used as the platforms
for diving operations including underwater videography. A professional diving
team consisting of ten members was identified and the necessary gear to dive to
the depths of up to 20 metres was mobilized. The first strap-on engine (S3) and
the stage was located, the strewn engine components were gathered underwater by
the divers and picked up by ORV Sagar Kanya on 20th July. The second strap-on
engine and stage (S2) was located and recovered on 27th July. Both S3 and S2 were
located within a radius of about a kilometer from the predicted impact points.
Search was continued by diving in other target locations for the remaining two
strap-on engines till end July. Based on the recovery locations of S3 and
S2, ISRO predicted new impact points for the remaining two strap-ons, i.e., S1
and S4. Emphasis was laid for the location of S4 engine that caused the failure
of GSLV. The information on new impact points formed the basis for undertaking
the Phase-II sonar surveys. An area of 6 sq.km was surveyed using CRV Sagar Purvi
from 9th to 11th September and 18 locations were marked as the possible targets
of debri. CRV Sagar Purvi and Sagar Paschimi were utilized from 19th to 27th September
for diving and physical examination of the seafloor. Strap-on S1 stage was found
to be disintegrated and strewn in an area of 0.5 kilometres and the S1-engine
and stage related components were recovered on 24th September. The search continued
and all the 18 locations were searched during the Phase-II. Considering
the recovery of three strap-ons (S1, S2 and S3) and based on their relative recovery
locations, ISRO reevaluated their data to predict the impact point of S4. A large
area of 92 sq km was defined for high resolution sonar surveys where about 600
line km of data was collected. The sonar surveys in Phase-III began on 8th October
onboard CRV Sagar Paschimi and completed on 13th September. A number of new possible
targets of debris were demarcated. Diving was carried out from 12th to 21st October
specifically aimed to locate S4 engine, leaving the areas where the core vehicle
likely to have been disintegrated. The components of S4 stage were recovered at
a number of locations. The major recovery was the S4 nose cone, middle parts of
the stage and base plate electronics etc. There was very little clue on the S4
engine and the related components. In a search of about 1 kilometre radius from
the S4 nose cone recovery location, melted, twisted and broken metallic pieces
of S4 lower stage parts were recovered. The prediction of S4 total disintegration
may offer a possible explanation for the non-recovery of S4 engine unlike other
three recovered. The diving was difficult in the area due to underwater
currents, poor visibility and the disturbance of the seabed due to intense fishing
activity. Natural features like sand bars, ripples, anchor and dredge marks on
the seafloor were physically distinguished and eliminated from the targets of
rocket debri by the visual inspection of the divers. Radial search upto 150 m
around the potential targets and systematic grid search methods were employed
from Sunrise to Sunset. About 550 diving operations were done during the campaign
that lasted for nearly 100 days overall. Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) was used
in a limited area during the nights due to depth and visibility limitations. GSLV
debri recovery from sea is perhaps the only second such attempt in the world.
The European Space Agency (ESA) reported the failure of their maiden test flight
of Ariane 5 in which the original four Cluster spacecraft were destroyed on 4
June 1996. It was reported that only about 40 seconds after initiation of the
flight sequence, at an altitude of about 3.7 km, the launcher veered off its flight
path, broke up and exploded. All the launcher debris fell back onto the ground
and scattered over an area of approximately 12 sq km. In contrast the GSLV lasted
for about a minute, reached an altitude of about 11 km and disintegrated and the
debri strewn over an area of approximately 60 sq km. The GSLV debri found nearest
to the launch pad is at a radial distance of 6.3 km (S4-Nose Cone) towards sea
and the farthest point is about 7.5 km (S3 engine). ESA reported that Recovery
of material proved difficult, however, since this area is nearly all mangrove
swamp or savanna. Nevertheless, it was possible to retrieve from the debris the
two Inertial Reference Systems. The results of the examination of this unit were
very helpful to the analysis of the failure sequence. Source
: Press Information Bureau Date :
November 06, 2006 |